Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

magistrate

Read a random definition: grange

A quick definition of magistrate:

A magistrate is a type of judge who can only handle certain types of cases. They can help other judges by doing things like issuing warrants and conducting preliminary hearings. In some states, they are the first judge you see for small problems like landlord-tenant disputes or minor criminal cases. They can't make big decisions like deciding who wins a case, but they are still important in the legal system.

A more thorough explanation:

A magistrate is a type of judge who has limited authority to hear certain issues. They can be found in both federal and state court systems.

In the federal court system, magistrates are judges appointed by the district judges of the court to assist the district court judges. They can:

  • Issue warrants
  • Conduct preliminary proceedings such as arraignments
  • Handle pretrial motions, such as motions to suppress

However, federal magistrates may generally not rule on dispositive matters, such as granting motions for summary judgment.

Some state court systems also have judges with the title of magistrate. For example:

  • In Georgia, each county elects a chief magistrate who serves as the court of first resort for issues such as landlord-tenant disputes, county ordinance violations, preliminary hearings of criminal cases, and other minor issues.
  • In Texas, all judges are defined as magistrates.

These examples illustrate how magistrates can have different roles and responsibilities depending on the court system they are a part of. In both federal and state courts, magistrates have limited authority and are often tasked with handling preliminary matters before a case goes to trial.

MACRS | Magna Carta

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.