Connection lost
Server error
A good lawyer knows the law; a great lawyer knows the judge.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Legal Definitions - mail box rule
Definition of mail box rule
The Mailbox Rule, sometimes referred to as the "dispatch rule," is a principle in contract law that dictates when certain communications, particularly an acceptance of an offer, become legally effective. Generally, when parties are communicating by mail, an acceptance of an offer is considered valid and binding at the moment it is properly dispatched (sent in the mail with correct postage), rather than when it is received by the party who made the offer. This rule provides a degree of certainty for the accepting party, as they cannot control the speed of postal delivery once the item has been sent.
However, the Mailbox Rule typically applies only if using the mail is an appropriate or specified method of communication. It can be overridden if the offer explicitly states that acceptance is only effective upon receipt, or if a different method of communication (such as personal delivery, email, or fax) is required. While the rule establishes that acceptance is effective upon dispatch, it's crucial to remember that the party awaiting the acceptance might still revoke their offer if they haven't *received* a response by a certain deadline, creating potential complications. The rule can also extend to other communications, such as the timely mailing of payments.
Example 1: Contract for Sale of Goods
Imagine "Antique Finds," a vintage furniture dealer, sends a written offer to a collector, Ms. Eleanor Vance, to sell a rare 19th-century writing desk for $5,000. The offer states that Ms. Vance has until Friday, October 20th, to accept. On Thursday, October 19th, Ms. Vance signs the acceptance form and places it in the mail with proper postage. Due to a postal delay, Antique Finds does not receive the letter until Monday, October 23rd.
How this illustrates the Mailbox Rule: Under the Mailbox Rule, a binding contract for the sale of the desk was formed on Thursday, October 19th, when Ms. Vance dispatched her acceptance. Even though Antique Finds did not *receive* the acceptance until after the stated deadline, Ms. Vance's acceptance was effective upon its mailing, making the contract valid.
Example 2: Lease Renewal Agreement
A landlord sends a tenant a lease renewal offer, stating that the tenant must accept by mailing back a signed agreement by the 1st of the month. The tenant signs the renewal agreement and mails it on the 30th of the previous month. The landlord, however, does not receive the mailed agreement until the 3rd of the new month.
How this illustrates the Mailbox Rule: Because the landlord specified mailing as the method of acceptance and the tenant dispatched the acceptance within the deadline, the lease renewal is considered legally accepted on the 30th of the previous month, when it was mailed. The tenant has successfully renewed their lease, regardless of when the landlord physically received the document.
Example 3: Timely Payment of a Bill
A credit card company's terms state that payments are due by the 15th of each month. If a customer mails their payment on the 14th, and the credit card company receives it on the 17th, the customer might still avoid a late fee if the Mailbox Rule applies to payments in this context (either by agreement or statute).
How this illustrates the Mailbox Rule: If the credit card agreement or applicable law incorporates the Mailbox Rule for payments, the customer's payment would be considered timely because it was dispatched on the 14th, before the due date, even though the company processed it after the 15th. This protects the customer from penalties due to standard postal transit times.
Simple Definition
The mail box rule, in contract law, establishes that an acceptance of an offer becomes effective when it is properly mailed by the offeree, not when it is received by the offeror. This principle applies unless the offer explicitly requires acceptance by personal delivery or by a specific receipt date. However, relying solely on this rule can be risky, as an offeror might revoke the offer if they have not received the acceptance by the expected time.