Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

malfunction theory

Read a random definition: secondary motion

A quick definition of malfunction theory:

The malfunction theory is a principle in products-liability law that allows a person who has been harmed by a product to prove that the product was defective by showing that it did not work properly, instead of having to prove a specific defect. However, the person must also show that they did not misuse the product and must rule out any other reasonable explanations for the malfunction.

A more thorough explanation:

Malfunction theory is a principle in products-liability law that allows a plaintiff to prove that a product was defective by showing that it malfunctioned, rather than having to prove a specific defect. This means that if a product doesn't work properly and causes harm, the manufacturer can be held responsible for the defect.

For example, if a person is injured while using a power tool that suddenly stops working, they may be able to use the malfunction theory to prove that the tool was defective and caused their injury. The plaintiff would need to show that the tool was being used properly and that there were no other reasonable explanations for the malfunction.

Another example could be a car that suddenly accelerates without the driver pressing the gas pedal. If the driver is injured in an accident caused by the sudden acceleration, they may be able to use the malfunction theory to prove that the car was defective and caused the accident.

The malfunction theory is an important tool for consumers to hold manufacturers accountable for defective products that cause harm. It allows plaintiffs to prove a defect without having to identify a specific flaw in the product.

malesworn | mal gree

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.