Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

malicious prosecution

Read a random definition: out-of-pocket loss

A quick definition of malicious prosecution:

Malicious prosecution is when someone files a lawsuit against another person without a good reason and with bad intentions. This can be a civil or criminal lawsuit. If someone is a victim of malicious prosecution, they can file a claim to get justice.

A more thorough explanation:

Malicious prosecution is when someone files a lawsuit without a good reason and with bad intentions. This can be a civil or criminal lawsuit. To fix this, the person who was wrongly sued can file a claim called a tort claim for malicious prosecution. This is also called vexatious litigation.

Example 1: John is angry at his neighbor, Sarah, for not returning his lawnmower. He decides to file a lawsuit against her for stealing it, even though he has no evidence that she did. This is an example of malicious prosecution because John filed the lawsuit without a good reason and with bad intentions.

Example 2: Mary is a police officer who arrests a man named Tom for a crime he didn't commit. She knows he is innocent but wants to make an arrest to look good in front of her boss. She files a criminal lawsuit against Tom, even though she has no evidence that he committed the crime. This is an example of malicious prosecution because Mary filed the lawsuit without a good reason and with bad intentions.

These examples show how someone can file a lawsuit without a good reason and with bad intentions. This is not fair to the person who is being sued and can cause a lot of stress and financial burden. That's why there is a way to fix this by filing a tort claim for malicious prosecution.

malice aforethought | malpractice

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.