Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

matrimonium non justum

Read a random definition: amittere liberam legem

A quick definition of matrimonium non justum:

Matrimonium non justum is a Latin term used in Roman law to describe a marriage between two people, where one or both of them do not have the legal capacity to wed. Children born from such a marriage are considered legitimate, but they are not under the control of their parents. Matrimony, on the other hand, refers to the ceremony or state of being married.

A more thorough explanation:

MATRIMONIUM NON JUSTUM

Matrimonium non justum is a Latin term used in Roman law to refer to a marriage between two people, one or both of whom do not have the legal capacity to wed. Children born from such a marriage are considered legitimate but are not under the control of the father.

An example of matrimonium non justum would be a marriage between a brother and sister, or a marriage between a person who is already married and another person. In both cases, the marriage is not legally valid because it violates the laws of conubium, which is the legal capacity to wed.

Another example would be a marriage between a minor and an adult. In Roman law, a minor did not have the legal capacity to wed, so any marriage between a minor and an adult would be considered matrimonium non justum.

Matrimonium non justum refers to a marriage that is not legally valid because it violates the laws of conubium. This means that the marriage is not recognized by the law, and any children born from such a marriage are not under the control of the father. The examples illustrate how certain types of marriages are not legally valid and are considered matrimonium non justum.

matrimonium | matrix

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.