Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

member

Read a random definition: cessavit per biennium

A quick definition of member:

A member is someone who owns a part of a company called a limited liability company (LLC). They have some control over the company, but they are not responsible for any debts or problems the company might have. Members can help run the company or just give money or property to become a member. When someone joins or leaves the company, it doesn't mean the company will stop existing.

A more thorough explanation:

A member is a person who has ownership in a limited liability company (LLC). This means they have a share in the company's profits and losses, but their liability is limited to the amount of their investment. Members have a say in how the company is run, but they are not personally responsible for any debts or legal issues the company may face.

For example, if John invests $10,000 in an LLC and becomes a member, he will receive a portion of the company's profits and losses. However, if the company is sued and owes $50,000, John's personal assets are not at risk beyond his initial investment.

Members can contribute to the company in different ways, such as providing professional services, cash, or property. They can also manage the company themselves or hire a professional team to do so. When a member joins or leaves the LLC, it does not affect the company's existence.

Within an organization, a member can also refer to any person who has rights and responsibilities. For example, a member of a sports team has the right to play in games and the responsibility to attend practices and follow team rules.

Megan's Law | Memorandum

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.