Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

member of Parliament

Read a random definition: dozen peers

A quick definition of member of Parliament:

Member of Parliament: A person who has the right to sit in one of the two houses of Parliament. They are called MPs for short.

A more thorough explanation:

A Member of Parliament (MP) is a person who has the right to sit in one of the two houses of Parliament. They are elected by the people to represent their constituency and make decisions on their behalf.

For example, in the United Kingdom, there are 650 Members of Parliament who sit in the House of Commons. Each MP represents a different area of the country and is responsible for listening to the concerns of their constituents and bringing them to the attention of the government.

A membership committee is a group of people who are responsible for managing the membership of an organization. They may be in charge of reviewing applications, approving new members, and maintaining membership records.

For example, a sports club may have a membership committee that is responsible for ensuring that all members have paid their dues and are following the club's rules and regulations. The committee may also be responsible for organizing events and activities for members.

Membrana is a Latin word that means "parchment". In history, it was used to refer to a skin of parchment or a notebook made of leaves of parchment.

For example, in medieval times, important documents such as royal charters and legal agreements were often written on parchment. These documents were referred to as membrana and were considered to be very valuable and important.

member of Congress | membrum

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.