Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

modified-comparative-negligence doctrine

Read a random definition: periphrasis

A quick definition of modified-comparative-negligence doctrine:

The modified-comparative-negligence doctrine is a legal principle that assigns liability for negligence based on the percentage of fault that each party is responsible for. If the plaintiff is found to be partially at fault, their recovery will be reduced by the percentage of negligence assigned to them. If the plaintiff's percentage of fault is 50% or more, their recovery is barred. This is also known as the 50-percent rule.

A more thorough explanation:

The modified-comparative-negligence doctrine is a legal principle that determines liability for negligence based on the percentage of fault assigned to each party. Under this doctrine, the plaintiff's recovery will be reduced by the percentage of negligence assigned to them, and their recovery will be barred if their percentage of fault is 50% or more.

For example, if a car accident occurs and the plaintiff is found to be 30% at fault for the accident, their recovery will be reduced by 30%. If the plaintiff is found to be 50% or more at fault, they will not be able to recover any damages.

This doctrine is different from the pure-comparative-negligence doctrine, which allows the plaintiff to recover damages even if they are more than 50% at fault.

Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System | modius

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.