Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Monroe Doctrine

Read a random definition: fraus legis

A quick definition of Monroe Doctrine:

The Monroe Doctrine is a policy that says no other country can control or interfere with the countries in North and South America. It was first announced by President James Monroe in 1823. This policy is not a law, but it has been followed by the United States for over a century. Other countries in the Americas have not agreed to this policy and sometimes do not like it. The United States is the only country that can decide when and how to apply this policy.

A more thorough explanation:

The Monroe Doctrine is a principle that the United States will not allow any non-American nation to intervene or dominate in the Western Hemisphere. It was first announced by President James Monroe in 1823.

For example, if a European country tried to colonize a country in South America, the United States would not allow it. This principle has some recognition in international law, but it is not a formal doctrine.

It is important to note that the Monroe Doctrine is not a rule of international law. It is a policy that the United States has followed for more than a century in its own interest. The United States claims the sole right to interpret the doctrine and applies it only as and when it chooses.

Overall, the Monroe Doctrine is a way for the United States to protect its interests in the Western Hemisphere and prevent other countries from gaining too much power in the region.

monopsony | monstrans de droit

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
lilypadfrog
13:14
why does the Fulbright have so much weight? idgi
And several pubs, and solid we. pretty awesome app
texaslawhopefully
13:14
idk I feel like that Fulbright isn't that big of a diff, there's so many countries where it is easy to get
snow
13:14
im telling yall, sictycoffees and nothim are like prime kobe and shaq
texaslawhopefully
13:14
it is prolly they just had a great overall narrative and not KJD
13:14
^
13:14
KJD 🗑️ squad
Maybe a fulbright alone isnt insanity, but pairing it with several first author pubs is sick
13:15
Besides lion ur killin jt
texaslawhopefully
13:15
yeah half tuition at CLS is fantastic
Thank you! But lowkey my page a lil fake. Withdrew from UChi after missing the II and the fact my future wife wants to leave the midwest anyways (i cant lie its mainly the first reason tho)
13:16
UChi didn’t inv u but you hit cls w half
13:16
That’s crazy haha
Honestly no clue. I missed NU waves too. Quite frankly, I think my why chicago statements were very meh
My PS and DS were sort of emotion but ended on a happy note. My why chi’s also did a little emotional stuff and I think it might’ve hurt me a bit. No clue tho🤷🏽‍♂️
Trismegistus
13:17
im pubbed in a bar association does that not mean anything wtfffff :(
13:18
@ImpartialLion: water under the bridge for you now tbh 🔥
13:18
Wonder what HLS is doing w our apps tho
texaslawhopefully
13:18
at least you're wondering lol
texaslawhopefully
13:18
I had the II and then got R'd
lilypadfrog
13:19
guys am I part of this conversation i also have a good lsat and no acceptances. I want to feel included
Trismegistus
13:19
my own alma mater straight up ignoring me too
13:19
@lilypadfrog: ur not a kjd without work experience. Back off
I think I’m headed for the HLS WL. I heard that if you get off the WL, you put down your deposit before you hear your offer? Idk how i feel ab that
13:19
*
Every thursday, i still pretend like I have a chance at a II tho
13:20
Yeh my friend got it 5/15 last year… crazy late
13:20
Same same maybe tomorrow 😭
lilypadfrog
13:20
@sadpadresfan: :(
texaslawhopefully
13:21
that's a good thing 😭
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.