Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Moving Party

Read a random definition: in jure cessio

A quick definition of Moving Party:

A moving party is a person or group involved in a legal case who is making a request to the court, called a motion. For example, if someone sues another person and asks the court to decide the case without a trial, the person who made the request is the moving party. The other person is called the non-movant because they are not making the request. Sometimes, a party can also make a request that goes against the moving party's request, and they are called a cross-movant. When the court decides whether to grant the request, it has to look at the facts in a way that helps the non-moving party.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A moving party is a party in a legal case who makes a motion. This means they are asking the court to do something, like grant a summary judgment. The non-moving party is the party who opposes the initial motion. A cross-movant is a party who makes a cross motion, which is a request that the court deny the initial motion and grant an opposing motion. When the court weighs whether to grant relief sought by a moving party, it may have to interpret facts in a way that favors one party or another.

In a civil case, the plaintiff may move for summary judgment. This means they are asking the court to rule in their favor without a trial. In this case, the plaintiff is the moving party. The defendant is the non-moving party, as they are opposing the motion for summary judgment. If the defendant also makes a motion, they become a cross-movant.

Another example could be in a criminal case, where the prosecution may move to admit certain evidence. In this case, the prosecution is the moving party, and the defense is the non-moving party.

These examples illustrate how the moving party is the party who initiates a motion, while the non-moving party opposes it. The court must carefully consider the arguments of both parties before making a decision.

Move | Mugging

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
13:34
as far as i know, that information is simply for data collection purposes
^
13:34
i don't think it has a detrimental effect on your chances of admission
13:34
but also you don't need to tell them anything so lol
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
Quillinit
15:10
oh fun @info-man, Chicago just changed to complete today, so we'll see
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.