Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Summary Judgment

Read a random definition: merchantman

A quick definition of Summary Judgment:

Summary judgment is a decision made by a court without having a full trial. It happens when one party asks the court to make a decision based on the facts of the case, and the judge decides that there is no need for a trial because there are no important facts in dispute. This means that the party who asked for summary judgment wins the case without having to go to trial.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Summary judgment is a legal decision made by a court without a full trial. It is entered for one party and against another party.

Overview: In civil cases, either party can request a pre-trial motion for summary judgment. This means that they are asking the court to make a decision without going through a full trial. To succeed in a motion for summary judgment, the party making the request must show that there is no genuine dispute about any material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Material fact refers to any facts that could allow a fact-finder to decide against the party making the request.

Examples: For example, in a car accident case, the defendant may request summary judgment if they believe that there is no dispute about who caused the accident. If the judge agrees, they will enter a judgment in favor of the defendant without a full trial.

Procedural Notes: Judges may grant partial summary judgment, which means that they may rule on some factual issues but leave others for trial. When considering a motion for summary judgment, the judge will view all evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion. If the motion is granted, there will be no trial, and the judge will immediately enter judgment for the party making the request.

Further Reading: For more information on summary judgment, you can read this Florida State University Law Review article, this New York Law Journal article, and this Oklahoma City University Law Review article.

summary adjudication | summary probate

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.