Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

N.O.V.

Read a random definition: fair wear and tear

A quick definition of N.O.V.:

Term: N.O.V.

Definition: N.O.V. is a short way of saying "notwithstanding the verdict" in Latin. It means that a judge can change the decision made by a jury in a lawsuit or criminal case if they think the verdict is not supported by the facts or the law. This is called a "judgment N.O.V." and it means that the judge thinks the jury should have made a different decision in the first place.

A more thorough explanation:

When a judge sets aside a jury's decision in a lawsuit or a guilty verdict because they believe the decision is not supported by the facts or the law, it is called a "judgment N.O.V." N.O.V. is short for the Latin phrase "non obstante veredicto," which means "notwithstanding the verdict."

For example, if a jury finds a defendant guilty of a crime, but the judge believes there is not enough evidence to support the verdict, the judge may grant a motion for a judgment N.O.V. and set aside the guilty verdict. This means the defendant is no longer considered guilty and may be released from custody.

Another example is in a civil lawsuit, where a jury may award damages to one party, but the judge may believe the evidence does not support the amount of damages awarded. The judge may then grant a motion for a judgment N.O.V. and reduce the damages awarded.

These examples illustrate how a judge can use a judgment N.O.V. to correct a jury's decision when they believe it is not supported by the facts or the law.

multiplicity of suits | National Labor Relations Board

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That’s good! You got a good routine going?
It’s ok, we ball
we ball
Yesirrrr
yeah, try to get most of the readings done on the weekends so the weeks arent as bad
hurting for free time though
Quillinit
11:52
wasp i just looked at your cycle and did you like pee in the shoes of admissions officers?
the retroactive withdrawls really hurt me
made them question my ability to stick through law school
withdrawals in undergrad?
yeah 2 years of classes
Quillinit
11:57
ah you filed retro W's from classes in UG?
Quillinit
11:58
ah okay, sorry homie that's rough
it's fine i got into one of my top choices so im really happy
Quillinit
11:58
<3 happy for you
getting into cornell is hugeee
ayyyyy
Quillinit
11:59
^^^^^ would love to get into Cornell lmao
Quillinit
11:59
or anywhere!
you got it, believeeee
12:06
@letsseehowitgoesnow: you okay?
12:08
@ KnowledgeableRitzyWasp did u withdraw frm all your classes for two years or just a few? i have 2 W's
12:23
listening to the front bottoms at the gym again ist es over fur mich?
My wife and I saw TFB with manchester orchestra the night before thanksgiving a few years back and it was pretty damn choice
shaquilleoatmeal
12:27
yoo lets dawg what happened, you good?
12:28
breakup
12:28
happens to the best of us
12:28
@UnsuitableMaliciousHedgehog: that’s so fucking sick
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.