Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

naked bailment

Read a random definition: growth management

A quick definition of naked bailment:

A bailment is when one person gives their personal property to another person to hold onto for a certain purpose. This is not the same as selling or giving away the property, because the ownership doesn't change. There are different types of bailments, like when someone pays to have their car parked or when someone borrows a friend's car for free. The person holding onto the property is called the bailee and they have to keep the property safe and return it to the owner. Sometimes, a bailment happens without an agreement, like when someone accidentally leaves something with someone else. If the bailee doesn't return the property, they can be in trouble.

A more thorough explanation:

Naked bailment is a type of bailment where the bailee (the person who receives the property) does not receive any compensation for holding the property. It is also known as a gratuitous bailment. In a bailment, the bailor (the person who delivers the property) transfers possession of personal property to the bailee for a specific purpose under an express or implied-in-fact contract.

For example, if you lend your friend your bike for a day, it is a naked bailment because your friend is not paying you to use the bike. Another example is when you leave your car with a friend while you are out of town. Your friend is holding your car for you, but they are not receiving any compensation for doing so.

In a naked bailment, the bailee is only responsible for the property if they are grossly negligent. This means that if the property is lost or damaged, the bailee is not liable unless they were extremely careless.

naked authority | naked confession

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.