Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

National Federation of Independent Business, et al. v. Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. (2012)

Read a random definition: Baker v. Selden doctrine

A quick definition of National Federation of Independent Business, et al. v. Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. (2012):

The National Federation of Independent Business, et al. v. Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. (2012) was a Supreme Court case that reviewed the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA). The case involved challenges to the individual mandate, which required certain individuals to obtain health insurance, and the expansion of Medicaid. The Court upheld the constitutionality of the ACA by finding that the individual mandate was validly imposed through Congress' taxing power and that the Medicaid expansion was legal, but prohibited the Secretary from withdrawing existing Medicaid funds from states that refused compliance with the ACA.

A more thorough explanation:

National Federation of Independent Business, et al. v. Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. (2012) was a court case that decided if the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) was constitutional. The ACA required people to have health insurance or pay a penalty, and expanded Medicaid to more people. Some states and individuals sued the Secretary of Health and Human Services, arguing that the ACA was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court decided that the individual mandate was constitutional because it was a tax, but that the Medicaid expansion was unconstitutional because it was coercive. The Court said that the federal government cannot force states to follow federal regulations. This case was important because it decided if the ACA was legal and affected many people's access to healthcare.

National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012) | National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Dkk
19:42
SEO is big money
2016 pushed the conservative party into populism irreversibly
Dkk
19:43
Maybe, but if this is populism, then every election is populist.
19:43
@Dkk: yeah register 1 website and every swinging tom dick and harry calls/emails/texts to 'help with seo'. like bruh, if YOU found it, what i am doing is working
Dkk
19:43
Indeed!
19:48
wasp, i think people are hopeful for a gov who at least attempts to care about the common man
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.