Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

natural presumption

Read a random definition: indefinite failure of issue

A quick definition of natural presumption:

Natural presumption is when a fact is assumed to be true based on another fact that is already known or proven. This is often used in legal cases as a way to shift the burden of proof to the opposing party. There are different types of presumptions, including conclusive (which cannot be overcome by additional evidence), rebuttable (which can be challenged with other evidence), and permissive (which the trier of fact can choose to accept or reject). Natural presumption is a deduction of one fact from another, based on common experience.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A legal inference or assumption that a fact exists, based on the known or proven existence of some other fact or group of facts. It is a deduction of one fact from another, based on common experience.

Examples: A common example of a natural presumption is that a person who is found with a smoking gun in their hand is presumed to be the one who fired the gun. Another example is that a person who is found with stolen property in their possession is presumed to have stolen it.

Explanation: Natural presumptions are based on common sense and experience. They are not absolute and can be rebutted with evidence to the contrary. In the examples given, the presumption that the person with the smoking gun fired it can be rebutted if there is evidence that someone else fired the gun. Similarly, the presumption that a person with stolen property in their possession stole it can be rebutted if there is evidence that they obtained it legally.

natural premium | natural resource

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.