Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

necessary party

Read a random definition: scrivarius

A quick definition of necessary party:

A necessary party is someone who is directly affected by the outcome of a lawsuit. They must be included in the case unless there is a good reason not to, like if they live in the same state as someone on the other side. If a necessary party can't be included, the case can still go on, but if an indispensable party can't be included, the case has to be dismissed. In some states, necessary and indispensable parties are the same thing.

A more thorough explanation:

A necessary party is a person or group of people who are directly affected by the outcome of a lawsuit. They must be included in the lawsuit unless there is a valid reason for excluding them. This is according to Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

For example, if a person is suing a company for damages, any employees who were involved in the incident may be necessary parties because their interests are directly affected by the outcome of the case.

If a necessary party cannot be joined, the lawsuit may still proceed, but separate actions may need to be brought against them. However, if a party is considered indispensable, the lawsuit cannot proceed without them and may be dismissed if they cannot be properly joined.

It's important to note that in state courts, the terms necessary and indispensable parties may be used interchangeably or not at all, depending on the state's laws.

Overall, a necessary party is someone who has a direct interest in the outcome of a lawsuit and must be included unless there is a valid reason for exclusion.

necessary inference | necessities

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.