Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

new-rule principle

Read a random definition: legal memory

A quick definition of new-rule principle:

The new-rule principle is a rule in criminal procedure that says federal courts cannot help a state prisoner who has already been convicted and sentenced if a new rule is made after their case is over. This means that if a new rule is made that could have helped the prisoner, they cannot use it to try and change their sentence. This is also called the nonretroactivity principle.

A more thorough explanation:

The new-rule principle is a legal doctrine that applies to criminal procedure. It prevents federal courts from granting habeas corpus relief to a state prisoner based on a new rule that was announced after the prisoner's conviction and sentence became final. This means that if a new rule is created after a person has been convicted and sentenced, they cannot use that new rule to challenge their conviction or sentence.

For example, let's say that John was convicted of a crime in 2010 and sentenced to 10 years in prison. In 2015, a new rule was created that would have made John's conviction invalid. However, because John's conviction was already final, he could not use this new rule to challenge his conviction.

Another example is if a new rule is created that changes the way evidence is admitted in court. If a person was convicted before this new rule was created, they cannot use this new rule to challenge their conviction.

These examples illustrate how the new-rule principle works. It ensures that people cannot use new rules to challenge their convictions or sentences if those rules were not in place at the time of their conviction.

new-matter rejection | new ruling

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Dkk
19:42
SEO is big money
2016 pushed the conservative party into populism irreversibly
Dkk
19:43
Maybe, but if this is populism, then every election is populist.
19:43
@Dkk: yeah register 1 website and every swinging tom dick and harry calls/emails/texts to 'help with seo'. like bruh, if YOU found it, what i am doing is working
Dkk
19:43
Indeed!
19:48
wasp, i think people are hopeful for a gov who at least attempts to care about the common man
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.