Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

No-answer default judgment

Read a random definition: juridical person

A quick definition of No-answer default judgment:

Term: No-answer default judgment

Definition: When someone sues another person and the person being sued doesn't respond or show up to court, the judge can automatically decide in favor of the person who filed the lawsuit. This is called a no-answer default judgment.

A more thorough explanation:

No-answer default judgment

A no-answer default judgment is a legal decision made in favor of the plaintiff when the defendant fails to respond to a lawsuit within the given time frame or fails to appear in court. This means that the plaintiff automatically wins the case without the need for a trial or further legal proceedings.

Example 1: John files a lawsuit against Jane for breach of contract. Jane fails to respond to the lawsuit within the given time frame, and as a result, the court issues a no-answer default judgment in favor of John.

Example 2: Mary is sued by her landlord for unpaid rent. Mary fails to appear in court on the scheduled date, and the court issues a no-answer default judgment in favor of the landlord.

A no-answer default judgment is a legal decision that is made when the defendant fails to respond to a lawsuit or fails to appear in court. This means that the plaintiff automatically wins the case without the need for a trial or further legal proceedings. The examples illustrate how a no-answer default judgment can be issued in different types of cases, such as breach of contract or unpaid rent.

No signal | no-contest clause

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.