Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

no-contest clause

Read a random definition: course of dealing

A quick definition of no-contest clause:

A no-contest clause is a rule that a person can put in their will that says if someone tries to challenge the will after they die, they won't get any of the money or things that were left to them. Different states have different rules about whether or not this rule can be enforced. Sometimes, if the person challenging the will had a good reason to do so, like if they thought something was wrong with the will, they might still be able to get their share. But it's important to check with a judge before trying to challenge a will with a no-contest clause.

A more thorough explanation:

A no-contest clause (NCC), also known as in terrorem clause, is a provision in a will that takes away a beneficiary's inheritance if they challenge the will after the testator's death. This means that if a beneficiary tries to contest the will, they risk losing their share of the inheritance.

The enforceability of a no-contest clause varies by state. In most states, the clause is enforced if the beneficiary's actions violate the terms of the clause. However, some states recognize the "probable cause" exception, which means that if the beneficiary had a reasonable belief that their claim was valid, they may still receive their inheritance even if they challenged the will.

For example, in a case from Georgia, the court decided that the probable cause exception did not apply. This means that the beneficiary who challenged the will lost their inheritance. However, beneficiaries can seek a court judgment to determine whether their challenge would trigger the no-contest clause of the will.

Overall, a no-contest clause is a way for a testator to discourage beneficiaries from challenging their will and to ensure that their wishes are carried out after their death.

No-answer default judgment | no-fault divorce

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.