Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

no par

Read a random definition: tax-loss carryback

A quick definition of no par:

No par stock is a type of stock that is issued without a specific value assigned to it. Instead, it is given a legal or stated value that may not reflect its actual value. This type of stock is often used for accounting purposes and may have little or no connection to its true value.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Stock issued without a specific value assigned to it. For accounting purposes, it is given a legal or stated value that has little or no connection to the stock's actual value.

Example: A company issues 1000 shares of no par stock. The company's board of directors decides to assign a legal value of $1 per share. This means that the company's total capital is $1000. However, the actual value of the stock may be higher or lower than $1 per share.

Explanation: No par stock is a type of stock that does not have a specific value assigned to it. Instead, it is given a legal or stated value for accounting purposes. This value may not reflect the actual value of the stock. For example, a company may issue 1000 shares of no par stock and assign a legal value of $1 per share. However, the actual value of the stock may be higher or lower than $1 per share. This allows companies to have more flexibility in setting the value of their stock and can make it easier to issue new shares in the future.

nonwaiver agreement | no-par-value stock

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 4 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
17:07
That's all anyone should've needed.
17:07
i am a 1 issue voter: national debt.
jackfrost11770
17:07
THERES A COP FUNERAL AND NOW THE BUSES ARENT RUNNING TO MY PLACE SO I HAVE TO WALK IN THE FREEZING COLD HOME
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.