Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

no-par-value stock

Read a random definition: principal place of business

A quick definition of no-par-value stock:

No-par-value stock is a type of stock that does not have a specific value assigned to it. Instead, it is given a legal or stated value that may not reflect its actual value. This type of stock represents a proportional part of a corporation's capital and grants the holder the right to participate in the company's general management and to share in its net profits or earnings. Unlike par-value stock, no-par-value stock does not have a fixed price and is often issued without a minimum price requirement.

A more thorough explanation:

No-par-value stock is a type of stock that is issued without a specific value assigned to it. Instead, it is given a legal or stated value that has little or no connection to the stock's actual value. This type of stock is often used by companies that want to have more flexibility in setting the price of their shares.

For example, if a company issues 100 shares of no-par-value stock and sets a legal value of $1 per share, the actual value of each share could be much higher or lower than that amount. This allows the company to adjust the price of its shares based on market conditions and other factors.

Another example of no-par-value stock is Berkshire Hathaway's Class A shares, which are currently priced at over $400,000 per share. Despite this high price, the company has never split its shares, which means that the actual value of each share is much higher than its legal value.

Overall, no-par-value stock gives companies more flexibility in setting the price of their shares, but it can also make it more difficult for investors to determine the true value of a company's stock.

no par | no-pass, no-play rule

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.