Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

non cepit

Read a random definition: sonticus

A quick definition of non cepit:

Term: NON CEPIT

Definition: Non cepit means "he did not take" in Latin. In legal terms, it is a general denial used in a replevin action that disputes both the taking and the place of taking. It is also known as non cepit modo et forma. This term is used to deny the fact and place of the alleged taking, but it does not deny the plaintiff's right of possession. In cases where replevin is brought for goods that were lawfully obtained but unlawfully detained, the general issue is "non detinet," which denies the detention but not the plaintiff's right.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Non cepit (non see-pit) is a Latin term that means "he did not take." In legal terms, it refers to a general denial in a replevin action that puts at issue both the taking and the place of taking. It is also known as non cepit modo et forma.

Example: In a replevin action, if the defendant denies taking the property and also disputes the place of taking, they can use the defense of non cepit. For instance, if a person is accused of stealing a car from a parking lot, but they claim that they did not take the car from that particular parking lot, they can use the defense of non cepit.

Explanation: Non cepit is a formal denial of both the fact and the place of the alleged taking. It denies the taking only and not the plaintiff's right of possession. It is used when the defendant wants to challenge both the fact of taking and the location of taking. The defense of non cepit is commonly used in replevin cases where the defendant denies taking the property in question.

noncash charge | noncitable

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.