Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

nonexempt property

Read a random definition: fundamental trend

A quick definition of nonexempt property:

Nonexempt property: When someone files for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, they may have to give up some of their property to pay off their debts. Nonexempt property is property that cannot be protected by the law and may be taken by the bankruptcy trustee to pay off creditors. This includes things like a second car or valuable collections. However, some property can be protected by claiming an exemption, which allows the debtor to keep certain things they need to start over, like their home or car. If the debtor doesn't claim an exemption, all their property may be considered nonexempt and taken by the trustee.

A more thorough explanation:

Nonexempt property is a term used in Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings. It refers to property that belongs to the debtor's estate and does not qualify for a statutory exemption. In other words, it is property that the debtor cannot protect from creditors.

For example, if a debtor owns a second car or a collection of valuable items, these would likely be considered nonexempt property. If the debtor fails to claim an exemption for this property, the Chapter 7 trustee can take it and sell it to pay off the debtor's creditors.

However, if the debtor claims an exemption for certain property, it becomes exempted property and is protected from creditors. This could include necessities like a home or a car up to a certain value.

The goal of exemptions is to help the debtor get a fresh start, but the balance of interests between the debtor and the creditors must be considered. If exempting the property would cause too much economic harm to the creditors, it will likely be considered nonexempt property.

It's important for debtors to file a timely list of exemptions to protect their property. If they don't, all of their property will be considered nonexempt and subject to liquidation.

nonexempt employee | nonfeasance

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
just tell them you're applying to monsters university
13:34
as far as i know, that information is simply for data collection purposes
^
13:34
i don't think it has a detrimental effect on your chances of admission
13:34
but also you don't need to tell them anything so lol
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.