Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

nonmutual collateral estoppel

Read a random definition: bootstrap

A quick definition of nonmutual collateral estoppel:

Nonmutual collateral estoppel is a legal term that means if someone was involved in a court case before and lost, they can't bring up the same issue again in a new case. This applies even if the new case is different from the old one. It can be used by someone who wasn't involved in the first case to stop the other person from bringing up the same issue again. It's like saying, "You already lost this argument before, so you can't bring it up again."

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Nonmutual collateral estoppel is a legal doctrine that prevents a party from relitigating an issue that has already been decided in a previous lawsuit, even if the second lawsuit involves a different claim. This doctrine can be asserted either offensively or defensively by a nonparty to the earlier action to prevent a party from relitigating an issue that was determined against it.

Examples:

  • Defensive collateral estoppel: A defendant in a personal injury lawsuit is sued by the plaintiff for damages resulting from a car accident. The defendant was previously sued by another plaintiff for the same accident and was found not to be at fault. The defendant can assert defensive collateral estoppel to prevent the plaintiff in the current lawsuit from relitigating the issue of fault.
  • Offensive collateral estoppel: A plaintiff sues a company for patent infringement. The company previously litigated the same issue in a different lawsuit and was found to have infringed on the patent. The plaintiff can assert offensive collateral estoppel to prevent the company from relitigating the issue of infringement.

These examples illustrate how nonmutual collateral estoppel can be used to prevent parties from relitigating issues that have already been decided in previous lawsuits. This doctrine helps to promote judicial efficiency and finality of judgments.

nonmovant | nonnavigable

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.