Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

nontestifying expert

Read a random definition: Prior appropriation doctrine

A quick definition of nontestifying expert:

A nontestifying expert is someone who knows a lot about a certain topic and helps one side in a court case, but they don't have to go to court to talk about it. They are called consulting experts. They give their opinions to the side that hired them, but they don't have to share their opinions with the other side. There are also impartial experts who are chosen by the court to give an unbiased opinion, and testifying experts who are expected to go to court and talk about their opinions.

A more thorough explanation:

A nontestifying expert is a type of expert who is hired by a party in a legal case to provide their opinion or expertise on a particular subject, but is not expected to testify in court. This type of expert is also known as a consulting expert.

For example, in a medical malpractice case, a doctor may be hired as a nontestifying expert to review medical records and provide their opinion on whether the defendant doctor acted negligently. However, they would not be called to testify in court.

Nontestifying experts are generally exempt from the scope of discovery, meaning that their opinions and work are not subject to disclosure to the other party in the case.

non terminus | nontrading partnership

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
22:43
No movement today
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.