Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Norris v. Alabama (1935)

Read a random definition: testamentary condition

A quick definition of Norris v. Alabama (1935):

Norris v. Alabama (1935) was a court case about nine young Black men who were falsely accused of raping two white women. One of the men, Clarence Norris, argued that he did not receive a fair trial because there were no Black people on the jury. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed and overturned his conviction, saying that there was evidence of discrimination against Black people in the jury selection process. This case helped to establish that everyone, no matter their race, should have a fair trial with a jury of their peers.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Norris v. Alabama (1935) was a case that involved the trial of nine young African-American men, known as the "Scottsboro Boys," who were falsely accused and tried for raping two white women. Clarence Norris was one of the accused. The case went to the U.S. Supreme Court, which overturned the Alabama Supreme Court's decision in Norris v. State. The Supreme Court found that Norris's right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment had been violated due to the systematic and arbitrary exclusion of African Americans from the trial venire. The Court also found evidence of discrimination in the jury selection process.

Example: The Scottsboro Boys were accused of raping two white women on a train in Alabama in 1931. Despite a lack of evidence, they were quickly convicted and sentenced to death. The case was appealed several times, and eventually went to the U.S. Supreme Court. In Norris v. Alabama, the Court found that the exclusion of African Americans from the jury selection process was unconstitutional, and overturned Norris's conviction.

Explanation: The example illustrates how the case of Norris v. Alabama was part of a larger legal battle over the rights of African Americans in the criminal justice system. The Scottsboro Boys were victims of a racist and unjust legal system, and their case became a symbol of the struggle for civil rights in the United States. The Supreme Court's decision in Norris v. Alabama was an important victory for civil rights advocates, and helped to establish legal precedents that would be used in future cases.

nontransferable ticket | North Carolina

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.