Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Norris v. Alabama (1935)

Read a random definition: miskering

A quick definition of Norris v. Alabama (1935):

Norris v. Alabama (1935) was a court case about nine young Black men who were falsely accused of raping two white women. One of the men, Clarence Norris, argued that he did not receive a fair trial because there were no Black people on the jury. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed and overturned his conviction, saying that there was evidence of discrimination against Black people in the jury selection process. This case helped to establish that everyone, no matter their race, should have a fair trial with a jury of their peers.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Norris v. Alabama (1935) was a case that involved the trial of nine young African-American men, known as the "Scottsboro Boys," who were falsely accused and tried for raping two white women. Clarence Norris was one of the accused. The case went to the U.S. Supreme Court, which overturned the Alabama Supreme Court's decision in Norris v. State. The Supreme Court found that Norris's right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment had been violated due to the systematic and arbitrary exclusion of African Americans from the trial venire. The Court also found evidence of discrimination in the jury selection process.

Example: The Scottsboro Boys were accused of raping two white women on a train in Alabama in 1931. Despite a lack of evidence, they were quickly convicted and sentenced to death. The case was appealed several times, and eventually went to the U.S. Supreme Court. In Norris v. Alabama, the Court found that the exclusion of African Americans from the jury selection process was unconstitutional, and overturned Norris's conviction.

Explanation: The example illustrates how the case of Norris v. Alabama was part of a larger legal battle over the rights of African Americans in the criminal justice system. The Scottsboro Boys were victims of a racist and unjust legal system, and their case became a symbol of the struggle for civil rights in the United States. The Supreme Court's decision in Norris v. Alabama was an important victory for civil rights advocates, and helped to establish legal precedents that would be used in future cases.

nontransferable ticket | North Carolina

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
14:01
no movement on the weekend
15:00
I just got a decision!
15:02
jk, but next week ill be back in the game after LSAT score is released. I want to thank my followers, my ops, and my acquaintances for all your support!
15:08
yayy llama yay
15:20
@c0bra1: U committed!? Congratz!
15:21
Go llama go
15:22
@LightningBug: And you have a options!! Congratz!
MrThickRopes
15:43
Waves fo pm
MrThickRopes
15:43
trust da plan
15:49
@llama: YO thanks fam
Guys
Just toured the area I’m supposed to move to for school
And got chia pudding
And thought of y’all
17:24
@OrganicAcridWizard: Dry chia seeds or bust
17:46
WERE THEY SOAKED
17:47
@llama: more like let the deposit deadlines expire lolz
17:59
@c0bra1: yeah true,
They were fluffy like quinoa
Heathen
How far are y’all moving for school
time zones
over 1,000 miles
i live in literal alaska
Ok goals same
Not Alaska but 1000+
r y’all freaked
19:48
damn im only moving 500
19:48
feel like i will be more freaked when it gets to august tho rn it seems fake to me
20:18
Wrote my wisdom thing and with that I'm logging off, my friends you know where to find me my haters may you find peace in your lives and everyone else take care and kick this cycle's ass
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.