Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

notice of orders or judgments

Read a random definition: Anglo-American common law

A quick definition of notice of orders or judgments:

Notice of Orders or Judgments: A written notice that tells someone about a decision made by a court. The court clerk or one of the parties usually provides this notice. If the court doesn't provide it, one of the parties has to. The clerk is required to give immediate notice of any order or judgment to any party to the case who is not in default.

A more thorough explanation:

A notice of orders or judgments is a written notification of the entry of an order or judgment in a legal case. This notice is usually provided by the court clerk or one of the parties involved in the case.

For example, if a judge issues a ruling in a divorce case, the court clerk will send a notice of the judgment to both parties. This notice will inform them of the decision and any actions they need to take as a result of the ruling.

In some cases, the court may not provide notice of a judgment, and it is the responsibility of one of the parties to do so. For instance, if a plaintiff wins a lawsuit against a defendant, the plaintiff's attorney may need to send a notice of the judgment to the defendant's attorney.

Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the court clerk is required to provide immediate notice of any order or judgment to any party to the case who is not in default. This means that if a party is not present in court when a judgment is issued, the court clerk must send them a notice of the judgment.

Overall, a notice of orders or judgments is an important legal document that ensures all parties involved in a case are aware of the court's decision and any actions they need to take as a result.

notice of motion | notice of prior-art references

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.