Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

One-satisfaction rule

Read a random definition: quare non permittit

A quick definition of One-satisfaction rule:

One-satisfaction rule: This means that if someone is hurt or harmed, they can only get compensation for that one time. They can't get paid twice for the same thing. If a jury gives them more than one thing, they have to choose just one. And if they already got some money for the harm, the person who hurt them can ask for the amount of money they already got to be taken out of the new payment.

A more thorough explanation:

The one-satisfaction rule is a principle that states a plaintiff should only receive one compensation for a particular injury. This means that if a jury awards multiple remedies for a single harm, the plaintiff may have to choose only one remedy. Additionally, a defendant may request to have a damage award reduced by any compensation the plaintiff has already received for the same harm.

For instance, if a person is injured in a car accident and receives compensation from the driver's insurance company, they cannot sue the driver for the same injury. If they do, the court will apply the one-satisfaction rule and only allow them to recover damages once.

Another example is if a person is injured on the job and receives workers' compensation benefits, they cannot sue their employer for the same injury. The workers' compensation benefits are considered the only compensation they can receive for that particular injury.

These examples illustrate how the one-satisfaction rule prevents a plaintiff from receiving double compensation for the same injury. It ensures that the plaintiff is only compensated once for their harm, and the defendant is not unfairly penalized for the same injury.

one-person, one-vote rule | one-year rule

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
but again, that's my perspective as a native New Yorker, I personally couldn't do it
starfishies
18:26
underrated school imo but I’ve gushed about them here enough 🤧
[] c0bra1
18:33
if they had more info on their ip law stuff i might've deposited there but i couldn't find much
[] c0bra1
18:35
lexington was the major turn off though i think i would go insane if i lived in a town that was like 4 streets long 💀
c0bra, that's what im saying... i was like hunny what is dis........
put your shoes on lets go find u a HOME
I'm from buttfuck midwest I will survive
Also @starfishies I would talk to u more about w&l if u wanted :)
[] c0bra1
18:41
you got a nice scholarship too @JupitersMoons
yeah, money talks and we broke as hell over here
starfishies
18:44
ill never pass up the opportunity
starfishies
18:44
guys W&L would’ve been my vibes pick
starfishies
18:45
Lexington = lock-in-ton
starfishies
18:45
get that gpa get that job get that money get out
that's the goallllll
also their Big Law % is High and places a ton in NYC and DC so like if u want NYC/DC then....
My cycle is officially OVER
we done, boysssss
[] c0bra1
20:04
@IrishDinosaur: congrats
21:01
@IrishDinosaur: AWESOME!
21:02
Curious on W&L if anyone can share their insights. lock-in-ton seems quite attractive as someone from BFE.
starfishies
21:30
they should sponsor me
21:50
@IrishDinosaur: upenn or money?
upenn son or ucla daughter?
MeowPossibilities
22:58
guys if a scholarshpi tab randomly popped up on status checker does that mean nothing or
Butt-Breaker-9
23:43
@windyMagician: UCLA daughter. 100%.
do law schools care about course rigor?
@AcceptableSourGerbil: not really. It's a soft at best. Sadly, LSAC GPA and LSAT are by far the biggest gatekeepers
@AcceptableSourGerbil: you have solid stats though, you should be very proud!
Based on my experience, I don't think most schools care too much about course rigor unfortunately. It might push you over the edge to an A, but it won't get your foot in the door.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.