If the law is on your side, pound the law. If the facts are on your side, pound the facts. If neither the law nor the facts are on your side, pound the table.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Legal Definitions - Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act

LSDefine

Definition of Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act

The Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act (OCILLA) is a crucial part of the larger Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) in the United States. Its primary purpose is to protect online service providers (OSPs) from being held financially responsible for copyright infringement committed by their users.

Imagine a situation where millions of users interact online, uploading content, sharing files, and browsing websites. If an OSP were held liable every time one of its users infringed copyright, the internet as we know it would struggle to exist. OCILLA provides a set of "safe harbors" – specific conditions under which an OSP can limit its financial liability for user-generated copyright infringement. While OSPs can still face injunctions (court orders to stop future infringement), OCILLA helps them avoid crippling monetary damages.

To qualify for these protections, an OSP must generally:

  • Adopt and reasonably implement a policy for terminating the accounts of users who are repeat copyright infringers.
  • Accommodate and not interfere with standard technical measures used by copyright owners to protect their works (e.g., copy protection technologies).

OCILLA outlines four main types of services that can qualify for these safe harbors:

  • Transitory Digital Network Communications: This covers OSPs that act as mere conduits, transmitting information across networks without initiating, selecting, or modifying the content.
  • System Caching: This applies to OSPs that temporarily store copies of frequently accessed content to make access faster for users and reduce network congestion.
  • Information Residing on Systems or Networks at Users' Direction: This is the most commonly known safe harbor, often referred to as "notice and takedown." It applies to OSPs that host content uploaded by users (like social media platforms or video-sharing sites). If an OSP receives a proper notification of alleged infringement, it must promptly remove or disable access to the infringing material.
  • Information Location Tools: This covers OSPs that provide tools like search engines or online directories that link users to content on other websites.

Examples of OCILLA in Action:

  • Example 1: A Video-Sharing Platform and User-Uploaded Content

    Imagine a popular video-sharing website where users can upload and share their own videos. A user uploads a full-length, copyrighted movie without permission from the film studio. The film studio discovers this and sends a formal "takedown notice" to the video-sharing platform, identifying the infringing video and requesting its removal.

    How OCILLA applies: Under OCILLA's "notice and takedown" safe harbor (information residing on systems at users' direction), if the video-sharing platform promptly removes the infringing movie after receiving the valid notice, it significantly limits its financial liability for the user's copyright infringement. This protection allows the platform to continue operating without being held responsible for every single infringing upload by its millions of users, provided it follows OCILLA's rules, including having a repeat infringer policy.

  • Example 2: An Internet Service Provider (ISP) and Data Transmission

    Consider a large internet service provider (ISP) that offers home internet connections to millions of subscribers. One of its subscribers uses their internet connection to illegally download and share copyrighted music albums through a peer-to-peer network. The ISP's network simply routes the data packets between the subscriber's computer and other computers on the internet.

    How OCILLA applies: The ISP, in this scenario, is acting as a passive "conduit" for the data, falling under the "transitory digital network communications" safe harbor. Because the ISP is merely transmitting data without initiating, selecting, or modifying the content, OCILLA protects it from monetary damages for its subscriber's copyright infringement, as long as the ISP adheres to the general requirements, such as having a policy for terminating repeat infringers.

  • Example 3: A Search Engine and Indexed Content

    A major search engine indexes billions of web pages across the internet. A user searches for a specific popular song, and among the search results are links to several third-party websites that illegally host the song for free download without the copyright owner's permission.

    How OCILLA applies: The search engine, by providing links to content hosted elsewhere, is covered by the "information location tools" safe harbor. As long as the search engine does not have actual knowledge of the infringement (or is not willfully blind to it) and promptly removes or disables access to specific infringing links when properly notified by a copyright holder, it limits its liability. This protection ensures that search engines can continue to organize and provide access to vast amounts of internet content without being held liable for every infringing item found on the websites they merely link to.

Simple Definition

The Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act (OCILLA), part of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), provides "safe harbors" that limit the monetary liability of online service providers (OSPs) for copyright infringement committed by their users.

To qualify, OSPs must meet specific conditions, such as adopting a policy to terminate repeat infringers and promptly removing allegedly infringing content upon proper notification, a process commonly known as "notice and takedown."

Success in law school is 10% intelligence and 90% persistence.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+