Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

ownership-in-place theory

Read a random definition: express notice

A quick definition of ownership-in-place theory:

The ownership-in-place theory is a way of describing the rights of someone who owns land with oil and gas reserves in many states. It means that the owner has the right to use the land to search for and produce oil and gas, and also has the right to possess the oil and gas that is still in the ground. However, if the oil and gas flows out from under the owner's land, their ownership of it ends. This theory is used in states like Texas, New Mexico, Kansas, and Mississippi. In other states, like California, Wyoming, Louisiana, and Oklahoma, a different theory is used called the nonownership theory, which means that the owner of the land only has the right to search for and produce oil and gas, but not to possess it until it is removed from the ground.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Ownership-in-place theory is a concept used in the oil and gas industry that states the owner of a property has the right to possess the oil and gas in place, as well as the right to use the land surface to search, develop, and produce from the property. However, the owner's interest in the minerals ends if the oil and gas flows out from under the owner's land. This theory is used in several major producing states, including Texas, New Mexico, Kansas, and Mississippi.

Let's say John owns a piece of land in Texas that has oil and gas reserves underneath it. According to the ownership-in-place theory, John has the right to possess the oil and gas in place and use the land surface to extract it. However, if the oil and gas flows out from under John's land and into a neighboring property, John no longer has any claim to it.

Definition: Nonownership theory is a concept used in the oil and gas industry that states the owner of a severed mineral interest does not have a present right to possess the oil and gas in place, but only to search for, develop, and produce it. This theory is used in several states, including California, Wyoming, Louisiana, and Oklahoma.

Let's say Jane owns a severed mineral interest in a piece of land in California that has oil and gas reserves underneath it. According to the nonownership theory, Jane does not have the right to possess the oil and gas in place, but only to search for, develop, and produce it. This means that Jane's interest in the oil and gas is similar to a profit a prendre, which is a right to use the land and remove items of value from it.

owners' equity | owner's policy

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.