Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

partes finis nihil habuerunt

Read a random definition: statutory disclaimer

A quick definition of partes finis nihil habuerunt:

Term: partes finis nihil habuerunt

Definition: partes finis nihil habuerunt is a Latin phrase used in law to mean "the parties to the fine had nothing." It refers to a plea that can be made to invalidate a transfer of land if the person who sold or transferred the land did not have the legal right to do so. This plea can be used if someone who has no legal claim to an estate interferes with it and tries to sell or transfer it. The plea can be used to set aside the transfer and return the land to its rightful owner.

A more thorough explanation:

Partes Finis Nihil Habuerunt

Partes Finis Nihil Habuerunt is a legal term that means "the parties to the fine had nothing." It is a plea used to set aside a transfer of land because the person who transferred the land did not have the right to do so.

If someone sells land that they do not own, the sale can be challenged using Partes Finis Nihil Habuerunt. For example, if John sells a piece of land to Jane, but it turns out that John did not actually own the land, Jane can use this plea to get the sale set aside.

Another example is if a stranger tries to interfere with an estate that does not belong to them. If they try to use Partes Finis Nihil Habuerunt to claim ownership of the estate, their claim will be invalid because they had no right to the property in the first place.

These examples show how Partes Finis Nihil Habuerunt is used to protect people from fraudulent or invalid land transfers.

partes beneficii | partes soli

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
9:32
[kevin oleary]
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:34
I mean if Fordham doesn't release today I will purposefully get on a train, go to new york, and then take the stinkiest shit inside the admission office's toilet (potentially clogging it and forcing them to get a plumber)
IS IT ONLY ON MY END WHY DID THAT SEND TEN MILLION TIMES
HELLO
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
it sent a million times lol
WHAT HAPPENED
yeah i thought you were tweaking for a second
i'm so sorry everyone what the actual fuck this website hates me
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
Jack's just tweaking on LSD no biggie
to be fair this accurately represents my mental state
election day psychosis coming in hot (fordham)
usc pls pull through .....
i literally just need one A so i can relax before my ED decision
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:38
oh that's right USC might release
soapy
9:43
USC still has not looked at my app
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:43
when did you submit soapy?
soapy
9:44
10/16
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:44
to be fair it took them almost 2 months for me to go under review
soapy
9:44
Feelin a bit stressed, as I've got no date change for Michigan either despite applying 10/7
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:45
I have not had a date change either for Mich but I've seen people get in without one so who knows
I applied 9/25 to like 6 schools and some (Houston) have no date change yet so dw
soapy
9:46
But do people get in without addresses going long?
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:46
it's tough to tell because a lot of people type out their addresses long to begin with
soapy
9:46
Ah. I didn't. Looking back, my Mich supplement kind of sucks, so there's that
Mich overrated (Dean Z please let me in even tho i didnt apply and I am below both 25ths)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.