Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

partes finis nihil habuerunt

Read a random definition: legal innocence

A quick definition of partes finis nihil habuerunt:

Term: partes finis nihil habuerunt

Definition: partes finis nihil habuerunt is a Latin phrase used in law to mean "the parties to the fine had nothing." It refers to a plea that can be made to invalidate a transfer of land if the person who sold or transferred the land did not have the legal right to do so. This plea can be used if someone who has no legal claim to an estate interferes with it and tries to sell or transfer it. The plea can be used to set aside the transfer and return the land to its rightful owner.

A more thorough explanation:

Partes Finis Nihil Habuerunt

Partes Finis Nihil Habuerunt is a legal term that means "the parties to the fine had nothing." It is a plea used to set aside a transfer of land because the person who transferred the land did not have the right to do so.

If someone sells land that they do not own, the sale can be challenged using Partes Finis Nihil Habuerunt. For example, if John sells a piece of land to Jane, but it turns out that John did not actually own the land, Jane can use this plea to get the sale set aside.

Another example is if a stranger tries to interfere with an estate that does not belong to them. If they try to use Partes Finis Nihil Habuerunt to claim ownership of the estate, their claim will be invalid because they had no right to the property in the first place.

These examples show how Partes Finis Nihil Habuerunt is used to protect people from fraudulent or invalid land transfers.

partes beneficii | partes soli

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
choosingpeace
13:10
@texaslawhopefully: lmaoo same Im crashing out so bad like it's never been this bad
texaslawhopefully
13:11
I need Chicago on Friday
Trismegistus
13:11
me too
Trismegistus
13:11
sixty coffees is having an insane cycle
PerpetualCheerfulBeaver
13:12
jesus they really are
GreyCeaselessMammoth
13:13
sixtys making a historic run here
Trismegistus
13:13
theyre close to my stats that's how i know them lol
choosingpeace
13:13
stanford harvard columbia duke wtfff
choosingpeace
13:13
uva nyu umich
13:13
I’m just tryna be like him fr fr
choosingpeace
13:13
that's crazy
Def that fulbright
choosingpeace
13:14
ohhhh
choosingpeace
13:14
i didn't even see that yep fas
lilypadfrog
13:14
why does the Fulbright have so much weight? idgi
And several pubs, and solid we. pretty awesome app
texaslawhopefully
13:14
idk I feel like that Fulbright isn't that big of a diff, there's so many countries where it is easy to get
snow
13:14
im telling yall, sictycoffees and nothim are like prime kobe and shaq
texaslawhopefully
13:14
it is prolly they just had a great overall narrative and not KJD
13:14
^
13:14
KJD 🗑️ squad
Maybe a fulbright alone isnt insanity, but pairing it with several first author pubs is sick
13:15
Besides lion ur killin jt
texaslawhopefully
13:15
yeah half tuition at CLS is fantastic
Thank you! But lowkey my page a lil fake. Withdrew from UChi after missing the II and the fact my future wife wants to leave the midwest anyways (i cant lie its mainly the first reason tho)
13:16
UChi didn’t inv u but you hit cls w half
13:16
That’s crazy haha
Honestly no clue. I missed NU waves too. Quite frankly, I think my why chicago statements were very meh
My PS and DS were sort of emotion but ended on a happy note. My why chi’s also did a little emotional stuff and I think it might’ve hurt me a bit. No clue tho🤷🏽‍♂️
Trismegistus
13:17
im pubbed in a bar association does that not mean anything wtfffff :(
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.