Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Pasula–Robinette test

Read a random definition: Purchase-money security interest

A quick definition of Pasula–Robinette test:

The Pasula-Robinette test is a legal principle used in cases where a miner claims they were retaliated against for filing a claim under the Mine Safety and Health Act. If the miner can show that they engaged in a protected activity and that an adverse employment action occurred because of that activity, they have established a prima facie case of retaliation. However, the mine operator can still win the case by proving that the adverse action was based on the miner's unprotected activity and that they would have taken the same action based solely on that activity.

A more thorough explanation:

The Pasula-Robinette test is a principle used in cases where a miner claims they have been retaliated against for filing a claim under the Mine Safety and Health Act. The test states that even if the miner has established a prima facie case of retaliation, the mine operator can still win the case by proving an affirmative defense.

The affirmative defense has three parts:

  1. The miner did not engage in a protected activity
  2. The adverse action was based on the miner's unprotected activity
  3. The mine operator would have taken the same action based solely on the unprotected activity

In order to establish a prima facie case of retaliation, the miner must show that they engaged in a protected activity and that an adverse employment action occurred as a result of that activity.

For example, if a miner files a complaint about unsafe working conditions and is then fired, they may claim that they were retaliated against for engaging in a protected activity. The mine operator could then use the Pasula-Robinette test to argue that the firing was based on the miner's unprotected activity, such as poor job performance, and that they would have been fired regardless of the complaint.

past consideration | pateat universis per praesentes

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.