Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Patent and Trademark Law Amendments Act

Read a random definition: false swearing

A quick definition of Patent and Trademark Law Amendments Act:

The Patent and Trademark Law Amendments Act, also known as the Bayh-Dole Act, is a law that allows the U.S. Government to take ownership or require licensing of inventions made by small businesses and nonprofit organizations while participating in federally funded programs. If an entity funded by the government creates an invention during a federally funded program, they must disclose it and can choose to keep the rights to it by filing a patent application. However, the government can still intervene and require the entity to grant licenses in certain situations. This law is found in 35 USCA §§ 200-212 and is also referred to as March-In Rights.

A more thorough explanation:

The Patent and Trademark Law Amendments Act, also known as the Bayh-Dole Act, is a federal law that allows the U.S. Government to take ownership or require licensing of inventions made by small businesses and non-profit organizations while participating in federally funded programs.

For example, if a small business receives funding from the government to develop a new technology, the government may require the business to disclose any inventions made during the project. The business can choose to keep ownership of the invention and file for a patent, but the government still has the right to force the business to grant licenses to others if necessary.

The purpose of the Bayh-Dole Act is to encourage innovation and the commercialization of new technologies by allowing small businesses and non-profit organizations to retain ownership of their inventions and benefit financially from them.

Patent and Trademark Depository Library | Patent and Trademark Office

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.