Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

patent troll

Read a random definition: Pre-existing duty doctrine

A quick definition of patent troll:

A patent troll is someone who collects patents and threatens to sue people who they think are using their ideas without permission. They don't usually make anything themselves, but they make money by getting settlements from the people they sue. Sometimes they have patents that aren't very clear or important, but they still try to use them to make money. People also call them patent-holding companies, patent assertion entities, or non-practicing entities, but not all of these are patent trolls all the time.

A more thorough explanation:

A patent troll is a term used to describe a person or company that hoards patents for the purpose of threatening alleged infringers with legal action. They typically do not manufacture the products for which they hold patents, earning their income primarily from the settlements that they receive from the people or companies that they have threatened.

Patent trolls hold patents that are often vague and ambiguous and seek to enforce patent rights extending beyond the patent’s actual value or contribution to the prior art. This means that they may threaten legal action against companies that are not actually infringing on their patents, but are instead using similar technology or ideas.

For example, a patent troll may hold a patent for a broad concept like “online shopping carts” and threaten legal action against any company that uses an online shopping cart, even if the technology used by that company is different from what is described in the patent.

Patent-holding companies (PHC), patent assertion entities (PAE), and non-practicing entities (NPE) are often classified as patent trolls, though not all of these entities are patent trolls in every case.

patent search | paternity suit

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.