LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

per quod consortium amisit

Read a random definition: daily newspaper

A quick definition of per quod consortium amisit:

Term: PER QUOD CONSORTIUM AMISIT

Definition: Per quod consortium amisit is a legal term that means a person has suffered a loss of companionship or affection due to the negligence or wrongful act of another person. This loss can be experienced by a spouse, parent, child, or other close family member. For example, if a person is injured in a car accident and is no longer able to provide emotional support or care for their spouse, the spouse may be able to seek compensation for the loss of consortium.

A more thorough explanation:

PER QUOD CONSORTIUM AMISIT

Per quod consortium amisit is a Latin legal term that means "by which he/she lost the company of his/her spouse".

If a person is injured in a car accident and as a result, loses the ability to have sexual relations with their spouse, they may be able to sue for damages under per quod consortium amisit.
If a person is wrongfully killed in an accident, their spouse may be able to sue for damages under per quod consortium amisit for the loss of companionship and support.

These examples illustrate how per quod consortium amisit can be used in legal cases to compensate a spouse for the loss of companionship and support due to injury or death.

per quod | per quod servitium amisit

General

General chat about the legal profession.

General >T14 Off Topic

👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎

RoaldDahl

16:15

So if it means nothing does that mean something?

HopefullyInLawSchool

16:17

Possibly

RoaldDahl

16:26

Cool

RoaldDahl

16:26

thank you!!!! i hope it means something

pinkandblue

16:31

fart

IrishDinosaur

16:36

Mich R gang lesgooo

AromaticDazzlingLlama

17:19

Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?

HopefullyInLawSchool

17:21

Ya it was sent to all YM applicants

starfishies

17:37

Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet

PoloBoy

17:38

Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month

starfishies

17:38

Wtf

starfishies

17:39

and the deadline is in like a week what is this

DashingThroughRaindrops

18:01

any cardozo movement?

BatmanBeyond

18:01

Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response

BatmanBeyond

18:02

This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache

DashingThroughRaindrops

18:02

loci already?

BatmanBeyond

18:09

If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers

ChuChuB

12:11

I got the same NDLS email

OrangeThing

12:18

I think the user profiles are broken

HippoDad

19:29

Any word out of Notre Dame?

HippoDad

19:29

Only the invitation to apply for LSE

HippoDad

19:29

Anyone received a decision from NDLS?

bigfatsloth

19:50

when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet

folkmore

0:30

how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?

BroadMotionlessStingray

5:02

Right. Broken links smh

mastermonkey45

11:40

I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.

EmptyFlakyGoose

12:08

The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?

bigfatsloth

13:18

i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march

CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage

13:24

@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)

steelrift99

14:30

Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.