Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

per se violation

Read a random definition: attestation

A quick definition of per se violation:

Per se violation: A bad thing that some companies do, like when they agree to charge the same high price for something, even though they should be competing with each other. This is always considered wrong and hurts people who want to buy things at a fair price, without needing to prove that it caused any specific harm.

A more thorough explanation:

A per se violation is a trade practice that is considered inherently anticompetitive and harmful to the public without any need to determine whether it has actually injured market competition. This means that the practice is illegal by its very nature, regardless of any specific circumstances or effects.

For example, price-fixing is considered a per se violation of antitrust laws. This means that if two or more companies agree to set prices for their products or services, they are automatically breaking the law, even if they do not actually harm competition or consumers in any way.

Another example of a per se violation is bid-rigging, which occurs when companies collude to rig the bidding process for contracts. This practice is considered inherently anticompetitive because it eliminates the possibility of fair competition and can result in higher prices and lower quality for the buyer.

These examples illustrate the concept of per se violations because they are practices that are considered illegal regardless of any specific circumstances or effects. Even if price-fixing or bid-rigging does not actually harm competition or consumers, they are still considered illegal because they are inherently anticompetitive and harmful to the public.

per se rule | persistent price discrimination

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.