Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Periodic Tenancy

Read a random definition: future-advances mortgage

A quick definition of Periodic Tenancy:

A periodic tenancy is when someone rents a place to live for a certain amount of time, but instead of having a set end date, it keeps going until the renter tells the landlord they want to leave. This can happen if they agreed to pay rent at certain times, even if they didn't say how long they would stay. To end a periodic tenancy, the renter has to tell the landlord they want to leave at least as much time before they leave as the length of time between rent payments.

A more thorough explanation:

A periodic tenancy is a type of rental agreement where the tenant rents a property for a certain period of time, usually a month or a year, and the tenancy automatically renews for another period until the tenant gives notice to end the tenancy. This type of tenancy can be created either by an explicit agreement between the landlord and tenant or by implication, such as when rent is paid at regular intervals without a specific end date being agreed upon.

For example, if a tenant signs a lease agreement for a year and continues to pay rent on a monthly basis after the lease expires, the tenancy becomes periodic. Another example is when a tenant rents a property on a month-to-month basis without a specific end date being agreed upon.

To end a periodic tenancy, the tenant must give notice to the landlord at least equal to the length of the period of the tenancy itself, unless the parties agree to different terms for termination. For instance, if the tenancy is monthly, the tenant must give one month's notice to end the tenancy.

periodic reports | perjurer

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.