Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Read a random definition: string of title

A quick definition of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896):

Plessy v. Ferguson was a court case in 1896 that said it was okay to have separate places for people of different races as long as they were equal. This meant that black people and white people could be kept apart in public places like schools and trains. The case was later overturned by Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) was a Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the doctrine of "separate but equal."

Overview: In 1890, Louisiana passed a law that required railroad companies to provide separate accommodations for white and black passengers. Homer Plessy, a man who was 7/8 Caucasian and 1/8 Black, was arrested for refusing to leave a whites-only passenger car. Plessy argued that the law violated his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees equal protection under the law. However, the Supreme Court ruled against him, stating that the law was constitutional as long as the separate facilities were equal in quality.

Example: Plessy v. Ferguson is an example of how the Supreme Court can interpret the Constitution in a way that allows for discrimination. The Court's decision in this case allowed for segregation to continue in the United States for several decades, leading to widespread inequality and injustice for Black Americans.

Explanation: The example illustrates how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution can have a significant impact on society. In this case, the Court's decision allowed for segregation to continue, which had a devastating effect on Black Americans. It shows how the law can be used to justify discrimination and how important it is to have a fair and impartial judiciary that upholds the principles of equality and justice for all.

Plenary session | Plyler v. Doe

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
so congratulations on pre xmas waves
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
10:27
Hope schools are chill and just send As leaving the Rs for next month lol
soap
10:49
Fingers crossed for good luck today
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
10:56
@soap: really hoping to get that UTK call today
11:08
what if instead of a room of one’s own virgina Woolf wrote a cubicle of one’s own
UGA ED deferrals are coming out rn
Only 14 days left until HLS sends out their first wave of decisions. I'm thinking about re-using my advent calendar to help me count down
alcohol advent calendar for decisions sounds incredible
@Unrepentant-Caucasian: ur bio is crazy
11:41
@chickenburgahfart: cauc is the zezemzer with a plan
@chickenburgahfart: Thanks, I guess? lol
Wow... Luigi Mangione just pled Not Guilty. He has to be banking on a jury nullification play, right? Honestly voir dire will be the most impactful part of the trial by far, I can't imagine the defense can present any credible exculpatory evidence.
12:00
I think he just wants it to go to trial
12:00
make a show of it
GreyCeaselessMammoth
12:02
they're charging him with terrorism, was he ever going to get a plea deal that was even remotely worth taking?
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:03
Dude wants to be famous and seen as a martyr this is his chance
GreyCeaselessMammoth
12:03
i think they want to roll the dice
I can understand that, but that's exactly why I would offer him a halfway decent plea deal as the DA. Maybe offer 25 years at medium security, as opposed to being guaranteed to die at ADX Florence.
snow
12:06
its a state case, right?
snow
12:06
not federal?
Oh yeah, my bad
snow
12:07
you're good, i was just making sure. yeah, i would take it to trial
snow
12:07
you just need one juror
snow
12:07
but i think that if i were the state, i would not be scared to bust the jury if i had to
I mean, you only need one juror to get a hung jury and a retrial, you need all 12 to get found innocent
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:08
I do not see him doing a long time, if he is not punished hard then more (less attractive) crazy people will come out and start murdering for social justice and expect the same
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:08
*him not doing a long time
snow
12:08
need to see what all he is charged with tbh
snow
12:09
and the possibility for parole in new york
snow
12:09
in texas murder is a 3g offense and he would have to do have that time before parole eligibility. idk how new york works
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.