Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

pocket judgment

Read a random definition: coercion

A quick definition of pocket judgment:

Pocket judgment is an old law that helped people get their money back if someone owed them a debt. It was a special kind of bond that the debtor had to sign, promising to pay back the money. If they didn't pay, the creditor could take their land, goods, and even their body to get the money back. This law was made a long time ago, in the 13th century, and was used until 1863. It was important for trade and commerce because it made people more confident to lend money.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Pocket judgment is a term used in history to refer to the Statute Merchant, which was a law created in the 13th century to help secure and recover debts. It allowed for a commercial bond to be established, which, if not paid on time, could result in swift execution on the debtor's lands, goods, and body. The term "pocket judgment" refers to this commercial bond.

Example: In the interest of commerce, the Statute Merchant was created during the reign of Edward I. This law allowed creditors to demand the seizure and imprisonment of their debtor's body if they failed to pay their debt on time. This was a significant change in the common law, which previously did not allow for a person to pledge their body or liberty for payment of a debt.

Explanation: The example illustrates how the Statute Merchant, also known as pocket judgment, was a significant development in the history of English law. It allowed for a new form of security for creditors and helped to promote commerce by providing a way to recover debts more efficiently. The term "pocket judgment" refers to the commercial bond established under this law, which was a powerful tool for creditors to enforce their rights.

pocket immunity | pocket money

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 7 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Remember when Elon musk literally did the nazi salute twice , yeah
Insane
his goal is to crush public opinion of the government by intentionally making ineffective and then pointing to how ineffective it is
Dkk
17:05
I personally think most people are one issue voters and rhey disagree on principle but things have to be done this say now or else they never will.
17:05
oh well should be a good little 'societal experiment' if u will
@SplitterusClitterus: he clearly just meant his heart goes out to him, just ignore his support for the literal fascist party in germany
17:06
dkk what's your one issue
texaslawhopefully
17:06
I was a one issue voter. My one fucking issue was that Trump encouraged an insurrection.
texaslawhopefully
17:07
That's all anyone should've needed.
17:07
i am a 1 issue voter: national debt.
jackfrost11770
17:07
THERES A COP FUNERAL AND NOW THE BUSES ARENT RUNNING TO MY PLACE SO I HAVE TO WALK IN THE FREEZING COLD HOME
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.