Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

poll book

Read a random definition: de bien et de mal

A quick definition of poll book:

A poll book is a list of people who are allowed to vote in a certain area. It used to be a paper book, but now it can be electronic. Electronic poll books let people sign in and poll workers can check if they are in the right place to vote. They can also see if someone has already voted somewhere else. Poll books used to be used to record votes, but now we use secret ballots to keep voting private.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A poll book is a list of all the people who are eligible and registered to vote in a particular voting district. In the past, poll books were used to record votes before the introduction of the secret ballot. Nowadays, electronic poll books are replacing the older paper-based ones.

For example, in the United States, electronic poll books are used in a majority of states. These e-poll books allow voters to sign in electronically and poll workers to scan driver’s licenses to pull up voter information. They can also redirect voters to the correct polling place, find real-time updates of voter history, see turnout numbers, and check whether a voter has already voted at another polling place.

However, there are concerns that e-poll books could pose greater security threats than the traditional paper-based ones and are more subject to cyber attacks.

In the United Kingdom and former British colonies, poll books are usually called “electoral rolls.”

Historically, poll books were used to record votes before the introduction of the secret ballot. Voters used to publicly raise their hands and have their names recorded in a poll book to have their vote recorded for an election.

Overall, a poll book is an important tool for ensuring that only eligible voters are allowed to vote in an election. It helps to prevent voter fraud and ensures that the election results are accurate.

poll | Pollution

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
17:38
Was that not why you said you voted for him?
17:38
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: can I ask what “2 years retroactive withdrawals” means
17:39
elon and trump realize there are many fish in the sea, and sometimes u can't just 'make it work'
@sadpadresfan: grades changed to W for two consecutive years of classes
Dkk
17:39
Nah, I did not vote. I have never voted in my life because I have a lot of issues with it. 4 years ago my mom filled out my ballot for me because she wanted to but I do not vote.
17:40
based fellow non voter
@llama i do not need or desire external validation.
17:40
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: ah I see
17:41
@LawIsForPeasants: ok, sorry, I will not bother u while u 'self validate yourself in the corner' my bad.
@llama: im self validating so hard rn
17:42
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: thats very ithica of you, wasp.
texaslawhopefully
17:44
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Out of curiosity, since you're in law school and prolly know fedsoc people, how conservative do you think you have to be to be in fedsoc? Like is a david french sort of conservative fairly common in it, or is it the maga type people mainly
i dont interact with any fedsoc people, but i dont know any maga people at cornell. but the student body overwhelmingly leans left, so i think they might not be comfortable showing that theyre conservative if that makes sense?
one time a guy kind of crashed out about masks in conlaw
but that's the most ive seen
texaslawhopefully
17:47
Yeah, that does make sense. I would like to join fedsoc, but I'm also, clearly, very opposed to Trump and where the GOP has gone.
if you join fedsoc and go for clerking and eventually become a judge. you will be pinholed into maga politics as long as maga is the predominant conservative stance
Idk if @irishdinosaur is online but congrats on UCLA!!
next you will say you want to be the first black kkk grand wizard
@SaddestPortlander: tysm!!!!
texaslawhopefully
18:00
yes congrats irishdinosaur! that's incredible
18:03
@IrishDinosaur: you inspire me and my completely misguided cope that I might ever get into UCLA
Super big congrats irish!!!
Also pretty much agree with Wasp. I think it’s more about getting the political/judicial position as a Fedsoc member that will likely require a stance siding with whatever the conservative majority party is at that time.
texaslawhopefully
18:07
Yeah, that's fair. I guess I need to think about it more assuming I start law school in the fall. I really want to clerk and that seems like the best option.
BUT i think once you get the position, you’ll have more leeway in making decisions more liberally. Sort of like how ACB and Gorsuch sometimes swing left after being portreayed in the media as far right (not sure if that was actually the case though).
From the perspective of someone who interned at the White House, I will add that my bosses always told me to “be careful about my resume.” Don’t want to align with any org that doesn’t fit your values because you won’t be trusted by the other side until you show them you’re legit again, and word travels in DC.
texaslawhopefully
18:10
I mean I highly highly doubt I'll become a federal judge, it's more just about getting a leg up in getting opportunities in the first place
Not sure how that true that is in practice and sorry for the long messages💀
texaslawhopefully
18:10
And, yeah, that's fair. Right now my resume probably looks like it's from someone who is center-right
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.