Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

prejudgment interest

Read a random definition: Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)

A quick definition of prejudgment interest:

Prejudgment interest is the extra money that a person who wins a court case can get. It is meant to make up for the harm they suffered before they won the case. The amount of prejudgment interest depends on the state where the case was heard. Some states have a fixed rate, while others use a special number to calculate it. For example, in California, the rate is usually 7% per year. Prejudgment interest can be awarded in many types of cases, such as when someone is hurt in an accident or when a business is cheated out of money.

A more thorough explanation:

Prejudgment interest is the interest that a creditor, usually a plaintiff in a case, is entitled to collect from the amount of a judgment. This interest compensates the creditor for an injury that occurred before the judgment.

The rate of prejudgment interest varies by state, and some states may apply a fixed amount, while others may tie the rate to an established index. For example, the California Constitution applies a general rate of interest at 7% per annum, and in Palomar Grading & Paving, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., the California Court of Appeals found that this 7% applies to prejudgment interest, at least on a mechanic’s lien.

When a court awards prejudgment interest, it is usually in addition to the damages awarded to the plaintiff. For example, in In re Oil Spill by the Amoco Cadiz Off the Coast of France, the Seventh Circuit awarded French plaintiffs $65 million in damages and $148 million in prejudgment interest in a suit arising out of the grounding of an oil tanker which resulted in a massive oil spill along the coast of Brittany. Another example is Short v. U.S., where the Federal Circuit awarded the Yurok Indians prejudgment interest on their damages to recover revenue generated from timber harvesting from which they were wrongly excluded.

These examples illustrate how prejudgment interest can significantly increase the amount of compensation awarded to a plaintiff. In both cases, the plaintiffs were awarded millions of dollars in damages, but the addition of prejudgment interest nearly doubled the amount they received.

Pregnancy Discrimination Act | Prejudice

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
@ClockworkBlue: I feel like most people could train for the 40 for the same amount of time as they do the LSAT and get close to sub 5 which would be equivalent to a 167+
this is like the schizophrenic posts JJK tik tok be putting out
powerscaling Law School deans up next
11:19
Election Day election day
Write in Dean Z vote
11:20
Saw a guy that wrote in Biden and he said no retirement for you buddy
1a2b3c4d26z
11:20
@ClockworkBlue: god I hope that's true
if the country was run the same as Mich Law it would be a better place
Imagine if election night was run by an adcom? Like, "yep, we could get the results Friday, or June 2025."
imagine if it was like Berkley applications
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
Election status: Complete
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
For months
triplethread
11:23
erection day
soapy
11:23
Shoutout to Robinhood's election bet not resolving until January
triplethread
11:23
is anyone else like certain that trump will win
ambitiouslizard
11:23
he aint winning
triplethread
11:23
i like being a pessimist
ambitiouslizard
11:24
he lost his re-election, why would he win this one?
1a2b3c4d26z
11:25
I have no idea why people have so much beef w berkeley's app
I've been reading a bit about "herding," which is this idea that pollsters are making the race look tied so they look right no matter who wins.
1a2b3c4d26z
11:26
Like... it's a more involved app but you don't have to do it? They're clearly trying to have some self-selection go on
I 100% agree with the self selection, I also am not even close to touching the medians there. However I think the huge PS plus the video and especially the very specific criteria for the why Berkeley essay is pretty crazy
I'm curious, how bold can one be in those videos? Is it worth making a satirical Jason Statham-action short if the adcoms have no sense of humor?
the more risk you take the higher chance of it backfiring
my instinct would be low humor bc if they have such a complex application I would feel hesitant to use a major part of it as a joke. They clearly take their admissions seriously and a joke video might convey the wrong thing at the wrong time. I think that humor is best put into a PS anecdote where it adds some shine to your personality
safe is always better
All good points
triplethread
11:34
@TheAdoptedOne: amazing
I almost did one for Vanderbilt and my idea was to do a documentary-style vid where I and others talked about me like it was an ESPN 30 for 30.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.