Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Premarital agreement

Read a random definition: nul tiel corporation

A quick definition of Premarital agreement:

A premarital agreement is a contract that two people make before they get married. This contract can decide what will happen if one of them dies or if they get divorced. It can talk about things like money, property, and who gets what. The contract has to follow the rules of contract law, but it doesn't need anything special to make it work.

A more thorough explanation:

A premarital agreement, also known as a prenuptial agreement or antenuptial agreement, is a contract made by parties to a marriage before the marriage takes place. This agreement may determine matters such as one party's rights in the estate of the other in the event of the death of one of the spouses. It may also determine what to do regarding issues that are likely to come up as a result of divorce, such as alimony or property division.

For example, a couple may agree in a premarital agreement that if they divorce, each party will keep the property they brought into the marriage and any property acquired during the marriage will be divided equally. This agreement must meet the requirements of contract law, with the exception that separate consideration is not required in most jurisdictions.

Premarital agreements can be useful for couples who want to protect their assets and avoid lengthy and costly legal battles in the event of a divorce. However, it is important to note that premarital agreements cannot determine child custody or child support arrangements, as these matters are determined by the court based on the best interests of the child.

preliminary prospectus | Premeditation

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.