Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

prevention doctrine

Read a random definition: motion for resettlement

A quick definition of prevention doctrine:

The prevention doctrine is a rule that says when two people make a promise to each other, they both have to do what they said they would do. They can't do anything that stops the other person from keeping their promise. This is like a promise to play together, where one person can't take away the toy they promised to share, or else the other person can't play. It's important to keep our promises and not prevent others from keeping theirs.

A more thorough explanation:

The prevention doctrine is a principle in contracts that states that each party has an implied duty to not do anything that would prevent the other party from fulfilling their obligation.

For example, if Party A agrees to deliver goods to Party B by a certain date, Party B has a duty to not do anything that would prevent Party A from delivering the goods on time. If Party B does something that makes it impossible for Party A to deliver the goods on time, Party B would be in breach of the prevention doctrine.

Another example would be if Party A agrees to pay Party B a certain amount of money in exchange for services rendered. Party B has a duty to not do anything that would prevent Party A from making the payment. If Party B refuses to provide the necessary documentation for Party A to make the payment, Party B would be in breach of the prevention doctrine.

The prevention doctrine is important in ensuring that both parties fulfill their obligations in a contract and that one party does not unfairly prevent the other from doing so.

prevention | preventive custody

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.