Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Prima facie

Read a random definition: fictitious name

A quick definition of Prima facie:

Prima facie means "at first sight." It can be used to describe evidence that is sufficient to establish a fact or raise a presumption unless disproved or rebutted. For example, if someone has prima facie evidence, it means that the evidence is strong enough to prove something unless someone can prove it wrong. It can also be used to describe something that appears valid at first glance but may need further evidence or information to confirm. A prima facie case is a legally required rebuttable presumption that is established by a party's evidence and can justify a verdict in their favor, provided it is not rebutted by the other party. Different torts have prima facie cases attached to them, and a plaintiff must prove all the components of a prima facie tort case to prove that the defendant committed that tort.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: At first sight.

Overview: Prima facie is a Latin term that can be used as an adjective or adverb. As an adjective, it means "sufficient to establish a fact or raise a presumption unless disproved or rebutted." For example, "prima facie evidence" means evidence that is enough to establish a fact unless it is disproved. As an adverb, it means "on first appearance but subject to further evidence or information." For example, "prima facie valid" means something that appears valid at first glance but may need further evidence to confirm its validity.

A prima facie case is a legally required rebuttable presumption. It is a cause of action or defense that is sufficiently established by a party's evidence to justify a verdict in their favor, provided such evidence is not rebutted by the other party.

Application: Various torts have prima facie cases attached to them. For example, the tort of trespass has a prima facie case with three components:

  • The defendant had the intent to invade the land
  • The defendant invaded the land
  • The plaintiff possessed the land and did not consent to the defendant's invasion

If the plaintiff is not able to prove one of the components, then a court will likely find that the tort did not occur.

Example: If someone enters your property without your permission, they have committed a prima facie case of trespass. However, if they had a valid reason to enter your property, such as delivering a package, then it would not be considered trespass.

Further Reading: For more information on prima facie, see Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 554 (2007); Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A., 534 U.S. 506 (2002); Hernandez v. New York, 500 US 352 (1991). Also, see this .

Price fixing | prima facie case

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
13:34
i don't think it has a detrimental effect on your chances of admission
13:34
but also you don't need to tell them anything so lol
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
Quillinit
15:10
oh fun @info-man, Chicago just changed to complete today, so we'll see
boglue
15:23
do you have to have lawhub advantage for the lsd status checker to work
lawhub kind of a freaky ass name now that i think about it
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.