Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

printed-matter doctrine

Read a random definition: ingross

A quick definition of printed-matter doctrine:

The printed-matter doctrine is a rule in patents that says you can't get a patent just for something that's printed, like words or pictures. It has to be a physical part of something that can be patented. For example, you can't get a patent for a system of writing music or making a phone book. But you can get a patent for computer software.

A more thorough explanation:

The printed-matter doctrine is a rule in patent law that states that printed matter cannot be patented unless it is a physical part of a patentable invention. This means that if the printed matter is not an integral part of the invention, it cannot be patented.

For example, the doctrine has been used to deny patents for systems of representing sheet music and for methods of compiling directories. In these cases, the printed matter was not considered to be an essential part of the invention and therefore could not be patented.

However, the printed-matter doctrine cannot be used to deny a patent for computer software. This is because computer software is considered to be a patentable invention in its own right, and the printed matter (i.e. the code) is an essential part of the invention.

Another example of a patentable invention that includes printed matter is a product label. The label may contain printed matter such as instructions, warnings, or other information that is essential to the use of the product. In this case, the printed matter is considered to be an integral part of the invention and can be patented.

princeps | Printers Ink Statute

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.