Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

prior consistent statement

Read a random definition: natural domicile

A quick definition of prior consistent statement:

A prior consistent statement is when someone says something that matches what they said before. This can be important in court if the person's testimony is being questioned. If they said something different before, that can make their current testimony less believable. But if they said the same thing before, it can help show that they are telling the truth. However, this type of statement can only be used for certain reasons and in certain ways in court.

A more thorough explanation:

A prior consistent statement is a witness's earlier statement that conflicts with the witness's testimony at trial. It is not hearsay if it is offered to rebut a charge that the testimony was improperly influenced or fabricated.

  • If a witness testifies in court that they did not see the defendant at the scene of the crime, but had previously told the police that they did see the defendant, the prior consistent statement may be admissible to rebut a claim that the witness is lying or has been influenced to change their story.
  • However, if the witness had never made a prior statement about the defendant's presence at the scene of the crime, then there would be no prior consistent statement to admit as evidence.

These examples illustrate how a prior consistent statement can be used in court to support or challenge a witness's credibility and the reliability of their testimony.

prior-claim rule | prior creditor

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
10:31
Yeah I think that’s kinda true but I think if you work super hard and are top 10%at the t≈50 you’re kinda chilling
eggan
10:31
in the tri state area absolutely. california theyve never heard of fordham
eggan
10:32
maybe not never but theyd rather take from a similarly reputable regional school in california like irvine or davis
eggan
10:32
im also doing fordham PI so its different
180letmein
10:32
Ahhh makes sense.
eggan
10:33
@winningest: top 10% isnt guaranteed tho. the curve might beat ur ass
eggan
10:34
between wayne and maurer tho for full rides id actually do maurer. indiana is a bigger name imo than wayne
eggan
10:35
you could probably get a cool job in chicago there
10:35
Between those two I lean Wayne bc I prefer location
eggan
10:35
gotcha its a location thing
TenFiftyILuvUGang
10:36
me and my friends we got money to spend
TenFiftyILuvUGang
10:36
me n my friends we got money to spend
TenFiftyILuvUGang
10:36
me n my friends me n my friends
10:37
It seems so odd that lower ranked schools tend to region lock you though, it’s the only profession that really works like that I feel
10:38
That’s part of my fear is I don’t truly know where I’ll want to live in a decade
10:38
kjkj
10:45
what's up bullet shields?
Mostlylegal
10:46
ANOTHER DAY ANOTHER FO PM?
10:48
Heard maga SLS wave this week
Mostlylegal
10:50
guys i dont think i can take this anymore
10:50
So join a gang, esse
10:51
Everything is a choice, brudda
ClassyPleasantHeron
11:36
I'm honestly surprised that NYU has bothered to send more As this late.
MrThickRopes
11:38
Where da decisions at
11:40
^
babycakes
11:40
NYU has not rendered decisions for 50+% all applicants
babycakes
11:41
of all
babycakes
11:41
They are one of the law schools with the most acceptances left to give, along with Stanford
Denny
11:47
hi babtcakes
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.