Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

prior-use bar

Read a random definition: book entry

A quick definition of prior-use bar:

A prior-use bar is a rule that prevents someone from getting a patent for an invention that was already used or sold publicly in the United States more than a year before they applied for the patent. This means that if someone else already made the invention and used it or sold it, the person applying for the patent cannot get it. The rule applies to any public use, commercial use, sale, or private transfer without a pledge of secrecy. There is a rare procedure called a public-use proceeding that investigates whether an invention was publicly used or sold before the patent application was filed.

A more thorough explanation:

A prior-use bar is a legal term that refers to a situation where a patent cannot be granted for an invention that was publicly used or sold in the United States more than one year before the application date. This is also known as a public-use bar.

If someone invents a new type of phone and uses it in public or sells it to others more than a year before they apply for a patent, they may not be able to get a patent for that invention. Similarly, if someone creates a new type of software and shares it with others without a pledge of secrecy, they may not be able to get a patent for it if more than a year has passed since the public use or sale.

These examples illustrate how the prior-use bar can prevent someone from obtaining a patent for an invention that has already been publicly used or sold. It is important for inventors to be aware of this rule and to apply for a patent as soon as possible after creating their invention.

prior sentence | prior-use doctrine

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.