Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

privileges and immunities

Read a random definition: transact

A quick definition of privileges and immunities:

Privileges and immunities are the basic rights that people have in free countries. These rights are protected by the U.S. Constitution, which says that citizens of each state have the same rights as citizens in other states. The Constitution also says that no state can make a law that takes away these rights. These rights include being protected by the government, owning property, and being safe and happy. However, there is still debate about which rights the state governments can limit. The U.S. Supreme Court is working to protect individual rights against state laws that might take away these rights.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Privileges and immunities are the basic rights that people have in free governments. These rights are protected by the U.S. Constitution in Article IV and the 14th Amendment. The Constitution guarantees that citizens of each state are entitled to all privileges and immunities in the several states, and that no state can make or enforce any law that would take away these rights.

For example, some of the privileges and immunities that citizens have include:

  • The right to be protected by the government
  • The right to acquire and possess property of every kind
  • The right to pursue and obtain happiness and safety

These rights are subject to some limitations that the government may prescribe for the general good of the whole. However, the exact nature of privileges and immunities that state governments can limit has been a matter of dispute. The U.S. Supreme Court has gradually leaned towards protecting the individual rights of citizens against state statutes that might impinge on constitutional rights.

For instance, if a state law prohibits citizens from practicing their religion, it would be considered a violation of their privileges and immunities. Similarly, if a state law denies citizens the right to own property, it would also be a violation of their privileges and immunities.

privilege against self incrimina-tion | pro hac vice

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.