Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

A quick definition of privity:

Privity: When two or more people have a special legal relationship, they are said to be in privity. This means they have a shared interest in something, like a problem or a contract. If one person wins a court case, it can affect the others in privity. For example, if a landlord wins a case against a tenant, it can also affect the tenant's roommate. Privity is important in property law and contracts.

A more thorough explanation:

Privity is a legal relationship between two or more parties that establishes a mutual interest in a substantive matter. This relationship can be established through various means, such as a contract, property ownership, or a prior legal judgment.

In civil procedure, a prior judgment can bind nonparties in privity if their interests were adequately presented in the original action. For example, if a lawsuit was brought against a company and the company's insurer defended the case, the insurer would be in privity with the company and bound by the judgment. However, if the insurer had a separate policy with the company that did not cover the claim, they would not be in privity and could bring their own lawsuit.

In property law, privity can be established through consensual legal relationships, such as a landlord-tenant relationship or a grantor-grantee relationship. For example, if a landlord leases a property to a tenant, they are in privity because they both have a mutual interest in the property. If the tenant subleases the property to someone else, the sublessee would not be in privity with the landlord because they do not have a direct legal relationship.

Privity of contract refers to the legal relationship between parties to a contract. If two or more parties are in privity, they are bound by the terms of the contract and have obligations to each other. For example, if a company hires a contractor to build a new office, they are in privity and the contractor is obligated to complete the work according to the contract. If the contractor fails to do so, the company can seek remedies for breach of contract.

Privileges and Immunities Clause | prize law

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.