Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

prize law

Read a random definition: Public necessity

A quick definition of prize law:

Prize law is the rules for capturing things at sea during a war. It includes things like ships and cargo. The rules say who can capture things and what to do with them. If a ship is captured, it might be sunk or taken to a friendly port for a court to decide what to do with it. Fishing boats are usually not captured. Prize law is different in different countries, but there are some basic rules that most countries follow.

A more thorough explanation:

Prize law is a set of rules and regulations that govern the capture of vessels, cargo, or other property at sea during an armed conflict. It is a part of maritime law and deals with the rights of the captor, the distribution of the proceeds of capture, and other related matters.

For example, if two countries are at war, and one country captures a ship belonging to the other country, it becomes a prize. The captor has certain rights over the prize, such as the right to sell it and keep the proceeds. However, there are also rules that govern how the prize should be treated. For instance, warships can be sunk, but private merchant ships should be taken to friendly ports for adjudication by a prize court whenever possible. Coastal fishing vessels of any nation have the right not to be seized while engaged in trade.

Prize law is not the same in every country, but there are some common basic rules that are followed by most countries. These rules are designed to ensure that the capture of prizes is conducted in a fair and orderly manner.

Overall, prize law is an important part of international law that helps to regulate the conduct of armed conflicts at sea.

privity | Pro bono

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.